vs
Why is Aonic 215 Universal better than WING?
- Weight30 g vs 33 g+10%
Why is WING better than Aonic 215 Universal?
- Highest frequency17,500 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+14%
- Lowest frequency22 Hz vs 20 Hz+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Bone conduction |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 22 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 17,500 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 20 Ω | 6 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 107 dB | 117 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 10 h |
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX Adaptive, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| NFC pairing | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 30 g | 33 g |
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
