How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OpenRun Mini USB-C vs Sonic

Shokz OpenRun Mini USB-C vs Suunto Sonic

What OpenRun Mini USB-C does better (1) and where Sonic wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Shokz OpenRun Mini USB-C
Shokz · 2024OpenRun Mini USB-C
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $110
vs
Suunto Sonic
Suunto · 2024Sonic
5.2Score
6 advantages≈ $130
Higher score
5.0Battery6.0
2.3Build & features5.0

Why is OpenRun Mini USB-C better than Sonic?

  1. Dust protection (IP)6 vs 5+20%

Why is Sonic better than OpenRun Mini USB-C?

  1. Weight380 g vs 31 g12.3×
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · OpenRun Mini USB-C: Yes
  3. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  4. aptXNo · OpenRun Mini USB-C: Yes
  5. Charging time1.5 h vs 1 h+50%
  6. Lowest frequency21 Hz vs 20 Hz+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Suunto SonicSuunto Sonic≈ $1305.2
Sound
FitBone conductionBone conduction
Ear cup designOpen-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Lowest frequency21 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance8 Ω6 Ω
Sensitivity4 dB117 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h10 h
Charging time1.5 h1 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.2
Bluetooth codecsSBCaptX Adaptive, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoYes
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight380 g31 g
Protection ratingIPX4IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)65
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare