How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OpenRun Mini USB-C vs Float Run WI-OE610

Shokz OpenRun Mini USB-C vs Sony Float Run WI-OE610

What OpenRun Mini USB-C does better (1) and where Float Run WI-OE610 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Shokz OpenRun Mini USB-C
Shokz · 2024OpenRun Mini USB-C
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $110
Higher score
vs
Sony Float Run WI-OE610
Sony · 2023Float Run WI-OE610
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ $90
5.0Battery4.4
2.3Build & features3.3

Why is OpenRun Mini USB-C better than Float Run WI-OE610?

  1. Charging time1.5 h vs 3 h2×

Why is Float Run WI-OE610 better than OpenRun Mini USB-C?

  1. Weight380 g vs 33 g11.5×
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitBone conductionOpen-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—16 mm
Lowest frequency21 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance8 Ω—
Sensitivity4 dB—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h10 h
Charging time1.5 h3 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15
Bluetooth codecsSBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Weight380 g33 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)6—
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare