Why is OpenFit better than WF-C700N?
- Total with charging case28 h vs 20 h+40%
- Charging time1 h vs 1.5 h+50%
Why is WF-C700N better than OpenFit?
- Active noise cancellingNo · OpenFit: Yes
- Battery life7 h vs 10 h+43%
- Lowest frequency50 Hz vs 20 Hz2.5×
- Highest frequency16,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 5 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 50 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 16,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 8 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 96 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 10 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 28 h | 20 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 1.5 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 5 min → 1 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4.6 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | Black, Beige | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
