vs
3.8Noise control & calls6.2
6.5Battery3.7
Why is RS 275 better than WH-1000XM4C?
- Battery life50 h vs 34 h+47%
- Weight195 g vs 253 g+30%
- aptXYes · WH-1000XM4C: No
Why is WH-1000XM4C better than RS 275?
- Active noise cancellingNo · RS 275: Yes
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- LDACNo · RS 275: Yes
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
- Lowest frequency6 Hz vs 4 Hz+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 6 Hz | 4 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | 106 dB | 106 dB |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 5 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 50 h | 34 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 27 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, AAC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| Auracast | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 253 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Purple |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Sennheiser RS 275vsSony WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration4.75.3vs
Sennheiser RS 275vsbeyerdynamic DT 990 PRO Xvs
Sennheiser RS 275vsSkullcandy Crusher 7204.74.2vs
Sennheiser RS 275vsPositive Grid Spark NEO
vs
Sony WH-1000XM4CvsBose QuietComfort Headphones (2nd Gen)5.35.5vs
Sony WH-1000XM4CvsHifiMan HE1000