vs
Why is IE 200 better than WF-1000XM6?
- Lowest frequency6 Hz vs 20 Hz3.3×
Why is WF-1000XM6 better than IE 200?
WF-1000XM6 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Bone conduction |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 8.4 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 6 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 18 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 119 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 12 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 8 h |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 47 g |
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 6.5 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
