How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. HD 250 BT vs NiceComfort 35

Sennheiser HD 250 BT vs Srhythm NiceComfort 35

What HD 250 BT does better (2) and where NiceComfort 35 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Sennheiser HD 250 BT
Sennheiser · 2020HD 250 BT
3.8Score
2 advantages≈ $60
vs
Srhythm NiceComfort 35
Srhythm · 2020NiceComfort 35
8.1Score
3 advantages≈ $60
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls9.2
2.9Battery5.8

Why is HD 250 BT better than NiceComfort 35?

  1. Weight125 g vs 180 g+44%
  2. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+10%

Why is NiceComfort 35 better than HD 250 BT?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · HD 250 BT: Yes
  2. Battery life25 h vs 50 h2×
  3. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity94 dB—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Battery & charging
Battery life25 h50 h
Battery life with ANC—30 h
Battery capacity—800 mAh
Charging time3 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 3 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecsaptX, AAC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXYes—
LDACNo—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight125 g180 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare