How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. HD 250 BT vs Crusher Evo

Sennheiser HD 250 BT vs Skullcandy Crusher Evo

What HD 250 BT does better (3) and where Crusher Evo wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Sennheiser HD 250 BT
Sennheiser · 2020HD 250 BT
3.8Score
3 advantages≈ $60
vs
Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Skullcandy · 2020Crusher Evo
4.3Score
2 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
2.9Battery5.4

Why is HD 250 BT better than Crusher Evo?

  1. Weight125 g vs 312 g2.5×
  2. aptXYes · Crusher Evo: No
  3. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+10%

Why is Crusher Evo better than HD 250 BT?

  1. Battery life25 h vs 40 h+60%
  2. Charging time3 h vs 2.5 h+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—40 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity94 dB100 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life25 h40 h
Charging time3 h2.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecsaptX, AACAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight125 g312 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlackTrue Black, Chill Grey, Primer, Realtree APX Black/Orange, Bone
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare