vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
5.2Battery5.1
3.6Build & features3.0
Why is CX Plus True Wireless better than EAH-AZ70W?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · EAH-AZ70W: No
- Battery life8 h vs 7.5 h+7%
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
- aptXYes · EAH-AZ70W: No
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
- Earbud weight (each)6 g vs 7 g+17%
- Highest frequency21,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+5%
Why is EAH-AZ70W better than CX Plus True Wireless?
- Driver size7 mm vs 10 mm+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 7 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 21,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | 114 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 7.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 6.5 h |
| Total with charging case | 24 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6 g | 7 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black, White | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Sennheiser RS 5200vsSennheiser CX Plus True Wireless5.95.9
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsSennheiser CX Plus True Wireless6.15.9
vs
Technics EAH-AZ70WvsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1
vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vsTechnics EAH-AZ70Wvs
Technics EAH-AZ70WvsJBL LIVE 300TWS5.75.7
vsJabra Elite Active 75tvsTechnics EAH-AZ70W5.35.7