How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN vs Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF

Samsung Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN vs Samsung Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF

What Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN does better (1) and where Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN
Samsung · 2024Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN
6.1Score
1 advantage≈ $380
vs
Samsung Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF
Samsung · 2024Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF
6.9Score
0 advantages≈ $360
Higher score
5.8Sound6.7
7.1Connectivity7.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XNUltra Slim HW-S800D/ZF
890 × 38401,160 × 3840
Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XNUltra Slim HW-S800D/ZFDifference
Height38 mm38 mm=
Width890 mm1,160 mm−270 mm
Depth40 mm40 mm=
Weight1,000 g1,400 g−400 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN better than Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF?

  1. Weight1,000 g vs 1,400 g+40%

Why is Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF better than Ultra Slim HW-S700D/XN?

Ultra Slim HW-S800D/ZF has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Speaker channels3.13.1.2
Channel count3.13.1
SubwooferWireless subwoofer includedWireless subwoofer included
Spatial / 3D audioYesYes
Dolby AtmosYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.2
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
AirPlayYesYes
Chromecast / Google CastYesYes
Spotify ConnectYesYes
Voice assistantGoogle AssistantAlexa
Design & build
Weight1,000 g1,400 g
Width890 mm1,160 mm
Height38 mm38 mm
Depth40 mm40 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
Features
Remote controlYesYes
Placementvor dem Fernsehervor dem Fernseher
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare