Why is HW-Q600H/EN better than A65K?
HW-Q600H/EN has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is A65K better than HW-Q600H/EN?
A65K has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | — | 460 W |
| Speaker channels | 3.1.2 | 3.1.2 |
| Channel count | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Subwoofer | Wireless subwoofer included | Wireless subwoofer included |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
| DTS:X | — | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.3 |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 1,150 g |
| Width | — | 880 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung HW-Q600H/ENvsULTIMEA SKYWAVE F40-Boom
vs
Samsung HW-Q600H/ENvsOakcastle SB80 Xtra 2.1 Split-Soundbar 200W
vs
Samsung HW-Q600H/ENvsJBL Bar 800MK2 7.1-Kanal-Soundbar
vs
Samsung HW-Q600H/ENvsJBL Bar 1000MK2 Soundbar 7.1.4ch Dolby Atmos, kabelloser Subwoofer
vs
Samsung HW-Q610GH/ZFvsTCL A65K
vs
Oakcastle SB80 Xtra 2.1 Split-Soundbar 200WvsTCL A65K
