vs
7.2Noise control & calls4.2
3.5Battery5.0
Why is Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530 better than OpenFit?
- Active noise cancellingYes · OpenFit: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- Total with charging case30 h vs 28 h+7%
Why is OpenFit better than Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530?
- Battery life6 h vs 7 h+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Number of drivers | 2 | — |
| Lowest frequency | — | 50 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 16,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 8 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 96 dB |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Head tracking | Yes | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 7 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 5 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 30 h | 28 h |
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 5 min → 1 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LC3, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IP57 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Colours | — | Black, Beige |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530vsTechnics EAH-AZ40M25.76.0vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530vsNoble Audio FALCON MAX5.76.0vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530vsHuawei Freebuds 55.76.0vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530vsFairphone Fairbudsvs
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530vsSamsung Galaxy Buds 2 SM-R1175.76.6
vs
Huawei FreeClipvsShokz OpenFit4.74.4