vs
3.1Noise control & calls7.2
Why is Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer better than Buds 6?
- Battery life30 h vs 6 h5×
Why is Buds 6 better than Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer: Yes
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.4+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Semi-open |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 11 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 3 |
| Lowest frequency | — | 16 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 40,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 90 dB |
| Spatial / 3D audio | — | Yes |
| Head tracking | — | Yes |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 30 h | 6 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 3 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 35 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 35 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant | — |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4.4 g |
| Protection rating | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Colours | Grey, White | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods 5vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vsHuawei FreeClip 2vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vsBose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vsHuawei FreeBuds Pro 5vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vsSony Linkbuds ClipvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vsXiaomi Redmi Buds 8 ProvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer