How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Foldable ANC 110 kabellose Over-Ear-Kopfhörer vs WH-CH535

Red Bull Racing Foldable ANC 110 kabellose Over-Ear-Kopfhörer vs Sony WH-CH535

What Foldable ANC 110 kabellose Over-Ear-Kopfhörer does better (2) and where WH-CH535 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Red Bull Racing Foldable ANC 110 kabellose Over-Ear-Kopfhörer
2 advantages≈ $55
vs
Sony WH-CH535
Sony · 2026WH-CH535
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $55
Higher score
9.2Noise control & calls6.0

Why is Foldable ANC 110 kabellose Over-Ear-Kopfhörer better than WH-CH535?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · WH-CH535: No
  2. Charging time1 h vs 3 h3×

Why is WH-CH535 better than Foldable ANC 110 kabellose Over-Ear-Kopfhörer?

  1. Battery capacity110 mAh vs 150 mAh+36%
Specifications

Side by side

Sony WH-CH535Sony WH-CH535≈ $554.5
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—30 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity110 dB—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—55 h
Battery capacity110 mAh150 mAh
Charging time1 h3 h
Quick charge (claimed)—3 min → 1,5 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—6
Bluetooth codecs—LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
Design & build
Weight—150 g
ColoursBlue—
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes

Related comparisons

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare