vs
Why is REALTA HP-R300BT better than Push Play Active S2PPW?
- Battery life12.5 h vs 10 h+25%
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- Driver size8.8 mm vs 6 mm+47%
Why is Push Play Active S2PPW better than REALTA HP-R300BT?
Push Play Active S2PPW has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 8.8 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 10 Ω | 22 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 95 dB | 104 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 12.5 h | 10 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 67 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
