vs
2.9Battery4.4
Why is Ne HP-R100BT better than Float Run WI-OE610?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Float Run WI-OE610: No
- aptXYes · Float Run WI-OE610: No
- LDACYes · Float Run WI-OE610: No
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
Why is Float Run WI-OE610 better than Ne HP-R100BT?
- Battery life8 h vs 10 h+25%
- Driver size7 mm vs 16 mm2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 7 mm | 16 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 96 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 10 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 33 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
