Why is Ne HP-R100BT better than Aonic 3?
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 18,500 Hz2.2×
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
Why is Aonic 3 better than Ne HP-R100BT?
Aonic 3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 7 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 18,500 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 26 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 96 dB | 108 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 21 g |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
