Why is HP-C28BTF better than H3?
HP-C28BTF has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is H3 better than HP-C28BTF?
- Battery life3.5 h vs 5 h+43%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · HP-C28BTF: Yes
- aptXNo · HP-C28BTF: Yes
- Driver size6.1 mm vs 8.6 mm+41%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6.1 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 3.5 h | 5 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 20 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 3 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | — | Gold |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
