vs
2.4Battery9.6
Why is HP-C28BTF better than Buds Air 8 Pro?
HP-C28BTF has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Buds Air 8 Pro better than HP-C28BTF?
- Battery life3.5 h vs 12 h3.4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6.1+15%
- Driver size6.1 mm vs 8 mm+31%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 6.1 mm | 8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 3.5 h | 12 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 50 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 3 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Buds 8 Provsradius HP-C28BTF4.54.3
vsPanasonic RB-C10vsradius HP-C28BTF4.34.3
vs
Realme Buds Air 8 ProvsJVC HA-A110T8.28.0vs
Realme Buds Air 8 ProvsAudio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NC8.28.1vs
Realme Buds Air 8 ProvsJVC nearphones HA-NP80T8.28.2vs
Realme Buds Air 8 ProvsSoundcore AeroFit 2 AI Assistant8.28.1