vs
7.6Battery8.8
Why is Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT better than C30?
Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is C30 better than Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx6+50%
- Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
- LDACNo · Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT: Yes
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
- Driver size10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 100 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 120 dB | 101 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 10 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.7 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX6 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx6 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
