vs
2.5Battery3.5
Why is QCY-T9 better than Echo Lite E11?
QCY-T9 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Echo Lite E11 better than QCY-T9?
- Battery life4 h vs 6 h+50%
- Driver size6 mm vs 13 mm2.2×
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.4+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 13 mm |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4 h | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 30 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 30 mAh |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.5 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP64 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 6 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
