Why is QCY-T9 better than WEAR7701?
QCY-T9 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is WEAR7701 better than QCY-T9?
- Earbud weight (each)4.5 g vs 4 g+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 92 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4 h | 4 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.5 g | 4 g |
| Protection rating | IP64 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 6 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
