How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Woodland vs ULT FIELD 3

PURE Woodland vs Sony ULT FIELD 3

What Woodland does better (1) and where ULT FIELD 3 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

PURE Woodland
PURE · 2023Woodland
7.8Score
1 advantage≈ $100
vs
Sony ULT FIELD 3
Sony · 2025ULT FIELD 3
8.2Score
2 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
5.8Battery7.9
7.9Build & features5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

WoodlandULT FIELD 3
174 × 130106256 × 11379
WoodlandULT FIELD 3Difference
Height130 mm113 mm+17 mm
Width174 mm256 mm−82 mm
Depth106 mm79 mm+27 mm
Weight900 g1,200 g−300 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Woodland better than ULT FIELD 3?

  1. Weight900 g vs 1,200 g+33%

Why is ULT FIELD 3 better than Woodland?

  1. Output power10 W vs 30 W3×
  2. Battery life14 h vs 24 h+71%
Specifications

Side by side

PURE WoodlandPURE Woodland≈ $1007.8
Sony ULT FIELD 3Sony ULT FIELD 3≈ $1108.2
Sound
Output power10 W30 W
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Battery & charging
Battery life14 h24 h
Battery capacity5,000 mAh—
Power bank function—Yes
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.2
Bluetooth codecsSBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Weight900 g1,200 g
Width174 mm256 mm
Height130 mm113 mm
Depth106 mm79 mm
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Dust protection (IP)66
ColoursGreen—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare