How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Classic Aura vs ULT FIELD 3

PURE Classic Aura vs Sony ULT FIELD 3

What Classic Aura does better (1) and where ULT FIELD 3 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

PURE Classic Aura
PURE · 2025Classic Aura
6.6Score
1 advantage≈ $85
vs
Sony ULT FIELD 3
Sony · 2025ULT FIELD 3
8.2Score
2 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
9.6Battery7.9
2.2Build & features5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Classic AuraULT FIELD 3
252 × 150106256 × 11379
Classic AuraULT FIELD 3Difference
Height150 mm113 mm+37 mm
Width252 mm256 mm−4 mm
Depth106 mm79 mm+27 mm
Weight1,960 g1,200 g+760 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Classic Aura better than ULT FIELD 3?

  1. Battery life30 h vs 24 h+25%

Why is ULT FIELD 3 better than Classic Aura?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx73.5×
  2. Weight1,960 g vs 1,200 g+63%
Specifications

Side by side

Sony ULT FIELD 3Sony ULT FIELD 3≈ $1108.2
Sound
Output power—30 W
Speaker channels2.0—
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliserYes—
StereoYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life30 h24 h
Battery capacity5,000 mAh—
Power bank function—Yes
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecsSBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Design & build
Weight1,960 g1,200 g
Width252 mm256 mm
Height150 mm113 mm
Depth106 mm79 mm
Protection ratingIPX2IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2IPx7
Dust protection (IP)—6
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
Light effectsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare