Poly Voyager Surround 80 vs Sony WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration

What Voyager Surround 80 does better (0) and where WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration wins (5) — every spec side by side.

4.4Score

0 advantages≈ $240

5.4Score

5 advantages≈ $270

Higher score

3.9Noise control & calls6.4

5.5Battery3.7

Why is Voyager Surround 80 better than WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration?

Voyager Surround 80 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Only differences	Poly Voyager Surround 80≈ $2404.4	Sony WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration≈ $2705.4
Sound
Fit	Over-ear	Over-ear
Ear cup design	—	Closed-back
Driver type	—	Dynamic
Driver size	40 mm	40 mm
Lowest frequency	20 Hz	4 Hz
Highest frequency	20,000 Hz	40,000 Hz
Sensitivity	132 dB	106 dB
Hi-Res Audio	—	Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling	No	Yes
Adaptive ANC	—	Yes
Transparency / ambient mode	—	Yes
Microphones	—	5
Battery & charging
Battery life	24 h	34 h
Battery life with ANC	—	27 h
Battery capacity	1,100 mAh	—
Charging time	1 h	—
Quick charge (claimed)	15 min → 10 h	—
Fast charging support	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
Wireless	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth version	5.3	6
Bluetooth codecs	—	LDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)	—	Yes
aptX	—	No
LDAC	—	Yes
Multipoint (two devices)	—	Yes
USB-C	Yes	—
3.5 mm jack / AUX	Yes	Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant	—	Google Assistant
Design & build
Weight	—	253 g
Foldable	—	Yes
Features
Touch controls	—	Yes