Why is The Gecko better than WH-CH720N?
- Weight143 g vs 192 g+34%
- Charging time2 h vs 3.5 h+75%
- Driver size32 mm vs 30 mm+7%
Why is WH-CH720N better than The Gecko?
- Battery life12 h vs 50 h4.2×
- Active noise cancellingNo · The Gecko: Yes
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 32 mm | 30 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 7 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 31 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 108 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 12 h | 50 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 32 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3.5 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 1 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 143 g | 192 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-M20xBTvsPogs Headphones The Gecko4.53.8
vsJBL Tune 720BTvsPogs Headphones The Gecko3.63.8
vsKekz KekzhörervsPogs Headphones The Gecko
vsJBL Tune 570BTvsPogs Headphones The Gecko4.03.8
vsOnanoff BuddyPhones PlayvsPogs Headphones The Gecko
vs
Sennheiser Accentum WirelessvsSony WH-CH720N6.56.6