How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK vs E3

Philips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK vs Sudio E3

What Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK does better (1) and where E3 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
1 advantage≈ $60
vs
Sudio E3
Sudio · 2024E3
4.7Score
0 advantages≈ $60
Higher score
9.3Noise control & calls7.2

Why is Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK better than E3?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%

Why is E3 better than Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK?

E3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sudio E3Sudio E3≈ $604.7
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—99 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—4.5 h
Wireless charging (case)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Weight—51 g
Protection ratingIPX5IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx4
ColoursBlack—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare