vs
9.2Noise control & calls7.2
Why is Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK better than WF-C710N?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is WF-C710N better than Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK?
WF-C710N has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 5 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 12 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 8 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 22 h |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 5.2 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Soundcore Liberty 5vsPhilips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
vsSennheiser Accentum OpenvsPhilips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
vsSennheiser TV Clear EarbudsvsPhilips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
vsOnePlus Buds 4vsPhilips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
vsJVC HA-EC77TvsPhilips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
vsJVC HA-EC75TvsPhilips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK