Why is TAT8506 better than ETT?
- Battery life8 h vs 6 h+33%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · ETT: No
- Lowest frequency7 Hz vs 20 Hz2.9×
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- LDACYes · ETT: No
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
- Driver size13 mm vs 10 mm+30%
Why is ETT better than TAT8506?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 13 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 7 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 104 dB | 98 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | 32 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 5 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
