How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAT8506 vs CX True Wireless

Philips TAT8506 vs Sennheiser CX True Wireless

What TAT8506 does better (4) and where CX True Wireless wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAT8506
Philips · 2022TAT8506
8.0Score
4 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
vs
Sennheiser CX True Wireless
Sennheiser · 2021CX True Wireless
4.5Score
2 advantages≈ $95
9.3Noise control & calls3.0
5.8Battery5.9

Why is TAT8506 better than CX True Wireless?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · CX True Wireless: No
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · CX True Wireless: No
  3. LDACYes · CX True Wireless: No
  4. Total with charging case32 h vs 27 h+19%

Why is CX True Wireless better than TAT8506?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 9 h+12%
  2. aptXNo · TAT8506: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT8506Philips TAT8506≈ $958.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size13 mm—
Lowest frequency7 Hz—
Highest frequency40,000 Hz—
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity104 dB—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h9 h
Total with charging case32 h27 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.1
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCaptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoYes
LDACYesNo
USB-C—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Colours—Black, White
Features
Touch controls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare