How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAT8506 vs Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400

Philips TAT8506 vs Samsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400

What TAT8506 does better (0) and where Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAT8506
Philips · 2022TAT8506
8.0Score
0 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400
Samsung · 2023Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400
0 advantages≈ $85
9.3Noise control & calls9.3

Why is TAT8506 better than Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400?

TAT8506 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400 better than TAT8506?

Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT8506Philips TAT8506≈ $958.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size13 mm—
Lowest frequency7 Hz—
Highest frequency40,000 Hz—
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity104 dB—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h—
Total with charging case32 h—
Battery capacity—60 mAh
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.2
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Bixby
Design & build
Protection ratingIPX4—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare