How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAT3708 vs RHOX

Philips TAT3708 vs Veho RHOX

What TAT3708 does better (2) and where RHOX wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAT3708
Philips · 2024TAT3708
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
vs
Veho RHOX
Veho · 2023RHOX
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ $25
3.2Battery2.2

Why is TAT3708 better than RHOX?

  1. Battery life6 h vs 5 h+20%
  2. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.1+6%

Why is RHOX better than TAT3708?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT3708Philips TAT3708≈ $254.2
Veho RHOXVeho RHOX≈ $253.6
Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size13 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance20 Ω—
Sensitivity92 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h5 h
Total with charging case—20 h
Battery capacity—40 mAh
Charging time2 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.1
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Weight50 g—
Protection ratingIPX4IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare