How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAT3509 vs Redmi Buds 5 Pro

Philips TAT3509 vs Xiaomi Redmi Buds 5 Pro

What TAT3509 does better (1) and where Redmi Buds 5 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAT3509
Philips · 2024TAT3509
5.9Score
1 advantage≈ $35
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Buds 5 Pro
Xiaomi · 2024Redmi Buds 5 Pro
8.8Score
7 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls5.0
4.6Battery7.5
5.5Build & features9.0

Why is TAT3509 better than Redmi Buds 5 Pro?

  1. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%

Why is Redmi Buds 5 Pro better than TAT3509?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 10 h+25%
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · TAT3509: Yes
  3. Total with charging case24 h vs 40 h+67%
  4. Battery life with ANC6 h vs 8 h+33%
  5. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  6. LDACNo · TAT3509: Yes
  7. Driver size10 mm vs 11 mm+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT3509Philips TAT3509≈ $355.9
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm11 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity104 dB—
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—2
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h10 h
Battery life with ANC6 h8 h
Total with charging case24 h40 h
Charging time2 h3 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 1,5 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsLC3, SBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE AudioYesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight45 g—
Earbud weight (each)—4.1 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare