vs
5.5Noise control & calls5.2
2.3Battery6.0
Why is TAT2520 better than Redmi Buds 8 Lite?
TAT2520 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Redmi Buds 8 Lite better than TAT2520?
- Battery life4 h vs 8 h2×
- Total with charging case14 h vs 36 h2.6×
- Driver size10 mm vs 12.4 mm+24%
- Battery capacity40 mAh vs 45 mAh+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 107 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | 2 | 2 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4 h | 8 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 4 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 14 h | 36 h |
| Battery capacity | 40 mAh | 45 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 45 g |
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4.5 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips TAT2520vsPhilips TAT13004.74.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Buds 8 LitevsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervs
Xiaomi Redmi Buds 8 LitevsHonor Choice X7e Activevs
Xiaomi Redmi Buds 8 LitevsSoundcore R50i NCvs
Xiaomi Redmi Buds 8 LitevsPhilips TAT2100vs
Xiaomi Redmi Buds 8 LitevsXiaomi Redmi Buds 6 Lite6.64.4