Why is TAT2205 better than QCY-HT01C?
TAT2205 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is QCY-HT01C better than TAT2205?
- Battery life4 h vs 5 h+25%
- Driver size6 mm vs 7 mm+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 7 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4 h | 5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 4 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 5.2 g |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
