Why is TAT2200 better than C30?
TAT2200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is C30 better than TAT2200?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx6+50%
- Charging time3 h vs 1 h3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 12 mm |
| Impedance | 105 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB | 101 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 10 h |
| Charging time | 3 h | 1 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX6 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx6 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
