Philips TAT2200 vs QCY MeloBuds A30 Kabellose Ohrhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 LDAC IPX5 golden
What TAT2200 does better (1) and where MeloBuds A30 Kabellose Ohrhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 LDAC IPX5 golden wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Noise control & calls3.0
Why is TAT2200 better than MeloBuds A30 Kabellose Ohrhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 LDAC IPX5 golden?
- Active noise cancellingYes · MeloBuds A30 Kabellose Ohrhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 LDAC IPX5 golden: No
Why is MeloBuds A30 Kabellose Ohrhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 LDAC IPX5 golden better than TAT2200?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Impedance | 105 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Charging time | 3 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Colours | — | Gold |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Fresh 'n Rebel Twins Core 2vsPhilips TAT2200
vs
Honor Choice X7e ActivevsPhilips TAT2200
vs
Honor Earbuds A ProvsPhilips TAT2200
vs
QCY MeloBuds A30 Kabellose Ohrhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 LDAC IPX5 goldenvsJVC HA-A4T
vs
QCY MeloBuds A30 Kabellose Ohrhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 LDAC IPX5 goldenvsFresh 'n Rebel Twins Fuse 2
