How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAT2139 vs A1

Philips TAT2139 vs Sudio A1

What TAT2139 does better (1) and where A1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAT2139
Philips · 2024TAT2139
7.0Score
1 advantage≈ $25
vs
Sudio A1
Sudio · 2023A1
7.1Score
2 advantages≈ $20
Higher score
9.3Noise control & calls3.1
4.4Battery9.8

Why is TAT2139 better than A1?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · A1: No

Why is A1 better than TAT2139?

  1. Battery life7 h vs 30 h4.3×
  2. Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT2139Philips TAT2139≈ $257.0
Sudio A1Sudio A1≈ $207.1
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size13 mm13 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance16 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity94 dB118 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Battery & charging
Battery life7 h30 h
Total with charging case28 h—
Battery capacity50 mAh—
Charging time2 h1 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—4 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare