How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAT2139 vs Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT

Philips TAT2139 vs radius Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT

What TAT2139 does better (2) and where Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAT2139
Philips · 2024TAT2139
6.7Score
2 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
vs
radius Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT
6.4Score
1 advantage≈ $25
4.2Battery7.7

Why is TAT2139 better than Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 100 Hz5×
  2. Driver size13 mm vs 10 mm+30%

Why is Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT better than TAT2139?

  1. Battery life7 h vs 10 h+43%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT2139Philips TAT2139≈ $256.7
Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size13 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz100 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity94 dB120 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life7 h10 h
Total with charging case28 h—
Battery capacity50 mAh—
Charging time2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—5.7 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare