How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAT2100 vs AUSTIN 2

Philips TAT2100 vs Urbanista AUSTIN 2

What TAT2100 does better (2) and where AUSTIN 2 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAT2100
Philips · 2026TAT2100
2 advantages≈ $20
vs
Urbanista AUSTIN 2
Urbanista · 2026AUSTIN 2
3.6Score
0 advantages≈ $20
Higher score
9.3Noise control & calls3.0

Why is TAT2100 better than AUSTIN 2?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · AUSTIN 2: No
  2. Total with charging case36 h vs 25 h+44%

Why is AUSTIN 2 better than TAT2100?

AUSTIN 2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—13 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Sensitivity105 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Battery & charging
Battery life—5 h
Total with charging case36 h25 h
Battery capacity50 mAh—
Charging time3 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version66
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare