vs
3.2Battery2.9
Why is TAST702BK/98 better than MI True Wireless Earphones 2?
- Battery life6 h vs 4 h+50%
Why is MI True Wireless Earphones 2 better than TAST702BK/98?
- Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver size | 6 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 94 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 4 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 50 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Colours | — | White |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
