How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAS4807 vs Woodland Mini

Philips TAS4807 vs PURE Woodland Mini

What TAS4807 does better (3) and where Woodland Mini wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAS4807
Philips · 2022TAS4807
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ $70
Higher score
vs
PURE Woodland Mini
PURE · 2023Woodland Mini
0 advantages≈ $60
8.7Build & features8.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

TAS4807Woodland Mini
170 × 7072124 × 12096
TAS4807Woodland MiniDifference
Height70 mm120 mm−50 mm
Width170 mm124 mm+46 mm
Depth72 mm96 mm−24 mm
Weight492 g650 g−158 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TAS4807 better than Woodland Mini?

  1. Output power10 W vs 5 W2×
  2. Weight492 g vs 650 g+32%
  3. Battery capacity4,400 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+10%

Why is Woodland Mini better than TAS4807?

Woodland Mini has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAS4807Philips TAS4807≈ $706.8
Sound
Output power10 W5 W
Lowest frequency80 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Battery & charging
Battery capacity4,400 mAh4,000 mAh
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)NoYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.1
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Weight492 g650 g
Width170 mm124 mm
Height70 mm120 mm
Depth72 mm96 mm
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Dust protection (IP)66
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare