How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAS4807 vs Woodland Glow

Philips TAS4807 vs PURE Woodland Glow

What TAS4807 does better (1) and where Woodland Glow wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAS4807
Philips · 2022TAS4807
6.5Score
1 advantage≈ $70
Higher score
vs
PURE Woodland Glow
PURE · 2023Woodland Glow
0 advantages≈ $55

Why is TAS4807 better than Woodland Glow?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx6+17%

Why is Woodland Glow better than TAS4807?

Woodland Glow has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAS4807Philips TAS4807≈ $706.5
Sound
Output power10 W—
Lowest frequency80 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Battery & charging
Battery capacity4,400 mAh—
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)NoYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight492 g—
Width170 mm—
Height70 mm—
Depth72 mm—
Protection ratingIP67IPX6
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx6
Dust protection (IP)6—
Colours—Green
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare