How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAMS3 vs HP-C28BTF

Philips TAMS3 vs radius HP-C28BTF

What TAMS3 does better (4) and where HP-C28BTF wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAMS3
Philips · 2026TAMS3
7.5Score
4 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
vs
radius HP-C28BTF
radius · 2026HP-C28BTF
4.4Score
0 advantages≈ $80
7.9Battery2.4
6.9Build & features6.8

Why is TAMS3 better than HP-C28BTF?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 3.5 h2.9×
  2. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.3+13%
  3. Driver size10 mm vs 6.1 mm+64%
  4. Earbud weight (each)2.5 g vs 3 g+20%

Why is HP-C28BTF better than TAMS3?

HP-C28BTF has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAMS3Philips TAMS3≈ $757.5
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm6.1 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity106 dB90 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones6—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h3.5 h
Battery life with ANC7 h—
Total with charging case42 h—
Battery capacity60 mAh—
Charging time—1.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)15 min → 3 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.3
Bluetooth codecsLC3, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)2.5 g3 g
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare