Why is TAH6509 better than Neo?
- Active noise cancellingYes · Neo: No
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
Why is Neo better than TAH6509?
Neo has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | — | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 42 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 70 h | — |
| Battery life with ANC | 45 h | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 600 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
