How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAH6000 vs Foldable ANC 110 kabellose Over-Ear-Kopfhörer

Philips TAH6000 vs Red Bull Racing Foldable ANC 110 kabellose Over-Ear-Kopfhörer

What TAH6000 does better (0) and where Foldable ANC 110 kabellose Over-Ear-Kopfhörer wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAH6000
Philips · 2026TAH6000
6.7Score
0 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Red Bull Racing Foldable ANC 110 kabellose Over-Ear-Kopfhörer
1 advantage≈ $55
9.2Noise control & calls9.2

Why is TAH6000 better than Foldable ANC 110 kabellose Over-Ear-Kopfhörer?

TAH6000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Foldable ANC 110 kabellose Over-Ear-Kopfhörer better than TAH6000?

  1. Charging time2.5 h vs 1 h2.5×
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAH6000Philips TAH6000≈ $556.7
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity108 dB110 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life30 h—
Battery capacity—110 mAh
Charging time2.5 h1 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version6—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Colours—Blue
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare