How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAH5205WT/00 vs Hesh Evo

Philips TAH5205WT/00 vs Skullcandy Hesh Evo

What TAH5205WT/00 does better (0) and where Hesh Evo wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAH5205WT/00
Philips · 2021TAH5205WT/00
3.8Score
0 advantages≈ $40
vs
Skullcandy Hesh Evo
Skullcandy · 2021Hesh Evo
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ $45
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
2.8Battery5.0

Why is TAH5205WT/00 better than Hesh Evo?

TAH5205WT/00 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Hesh Evo better than TAH5205WT/00?

  1. Battery life29 h vs 36 h+24%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity90 dB91 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life29 h36 h
Charging time3.5 h—
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight210 g213 g
FoldableYesYes
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare