How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAH5205WT/00 vs Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones

Philips TAH5205WT/00 vs Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones

What TAH5205WT/00 does better (1) and where Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAH5205WT/00
Philips · 2021TAH5205WT/00
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ $40
vs
Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ $35
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
2.8Battery3.4

Why is TAH5205WT/00 better than Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones?

  1. Battery life29 h vs 22 h+32%

Why is Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones better than TAH5205WT/00?

  1. Charging time3.5 h vs 2 h+75%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω30 Ω
Sensitivity90 dB126 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life29 h22 h
Charging time3.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight210 g—
FoldableYesYes
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare