How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAH5205WT/00 vs HD 250 BT

Philips TAH5205WT/00 vs Sennheiser HD 250 BT

What TAH5205WT/00 does better (1) and where HD 250 BT wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAH5205WT/00
Philips · 2021TAH5205WT/00
3.7Score
1 advantage≈ $40
vs
Sennheiser HD 250 BT
Sennheiser · 2020HD 250 BT
3.8Score
3 advantages≈ $60
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls4.0
2.7Battery2.9

Why is TAH5205WT/00 better than HD 250 BT?

  1. Battery life29 h vs 25 h+16%

Why is HD 250 BT better than TAH5205WT/00?

  1. Weight210 g vs 125 g+68%
  2. Charging time3.5 h vs 3 h+17%
  3. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz22,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity90 dB94 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life29 h25 h
Charging time3.5 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecs—aptX, AAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—Yes
LDAC—No
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight210 g125 g
FoldableYes—
ColoursWhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare