Why is TAH4500 better than TAK4200?
- Active noise cancellingYes · TAK4200: No
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
- Battery capacity500 mAh vs 300 mAh+67%
Why is TAK4200 better than TAH4500?
TAK4200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 32 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 113 dB | 85 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 45 h |
| Battery capacity | 500 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 129 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
